SPR-Pages

pagelogo
back
small molcule binding - SPRpages
back
These are the posts of the old forum. It was not possible to transfer the user data, so they are missing in most of the posts. For new questions, go to the general discussions.

small molcule binding

  • OldForum
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
12 years 8 months ago #1 by OldForum
small molcule binding was created by OldForum
Dear SPR users!

I am measuring the interaction between a protein (coated) and a small inhibitor (200Da) on biacoreT100. To get high responce I immobilized high level of protein 10000RU and got a good resonse of the inhibitor (Rmax 50), which is specific (no unspecific on reference and negative control doesnt bind to the coated flow cell), the analyte concentration are 7-500µM.
the sensorgram looks good, the KD seems to be ok, but the ka is too low (13[1/M*s]!!!).
What am I doing wrong?
Than you
Bsol

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • OldForum
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
12 years 8 months ago #2 by OldForum
Replied by OldForum on topic small molcule binding
Hi,

How did you analyze the curves? What was the ka, kd and KD?
If you simulate the curves with the found numbers, do you get the same curves as you measured?

Arnoud

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • OldForum
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
12 years 8 months ago #3 by OldForum
Replied by OldForum on topic small molcule binding
Hi Arnoud,
I analyzed the curves with 1:1 model with T100 evaluation software,
the ka is 13[1/M*s], the kd is 0,002471[1/s], KD 1,853E-4 and rmax 55, flow 20µl/min, Chi2=2,11. When I simulate the curves I get the similar curves.



The simulation is ok with the exception of the beginning and the end of the injection where the buffer jump is simulated insetad of a fast a- and desociation.

Thank you
Barbara
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • OldForum
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
12 years 8 months ago #4 by OldForum
Replied by OldForum on topic small molcule binding
Hi Barbara,

Why do you think the ka is not right (13 [1/M*s] is very slow)? On what basis do you think the KD is OK. Did you other types of experiments to determine this?

You can try to fit without the bufferjump, but it looks like the kinetics are not exactly 1:1.
Also you can try the fitting module of Scrubber when you have that and compare.
Try fitting the kd alone: is it the same?

Arnoud

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • OldForum
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
12 years 8 months ago #5 by OldForum
Replied by OldForum on topic small molcule binding
Hi Arnoud,

Yes, the KD ( the IC50 value for this inhibitor ) has been determined in enzyme activity assay to be in this range.
The ka is too low because: the Quality control of biacore T100 says: ka outside the limits that can be measured by the instrument! (I don´t really know what that means, beacause it is actually measured??)
And I think that so slow interaction couldnt cause fast enzyme inactivation?

I tried to fit without buffer jump, but i think now this is not really a problem, but the non-1:1 kinetics, or some unspecific binding on denatured protein part on the chip next to the actual binding.
When I fit kd alone i get values from 7,82e-4 for the highest concentration and 2,92e-3 for the lowest.

Barbara

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • OldForum
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
12 years 8 months ago #6 by OldForum
Replied by OldForum on topic small molcule binding
Hi Barbara,

I understand now the error message: The instrument software is not capable to measure this slow association. Although it will calculated mathematically, the value is outside the specifications of the machine. However it is hard to understand why, because the curves look not that bad and the simulation was ok. You can check the specification of the machine for ka and kd.

The difference in kd is almost a factor 4, which is not so much but can be an indication of some secondary binding or mass transport. It can help to perform the experiment again with a higher flow rate if possible or lower the amount of ligand on the sensor chip.

I hope this wil hepl you because otherwise I don't know.

Arnoud

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Powered by Kunena Forum